[The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Rating of Spillways]   [The hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   [Problems]   [References]   •   CHAPTER 9: STEADY RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW 9.1  THE SHARP-CRESTED WEIR [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Labyrinth Spillways]   [The hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   [Problems]   [References]   •   [Top]   Rapidly varied flow differs from gradually varied flow (Chapter 7) in the greater curvature of the streamlines. In extreme cases, the flow is virtually broken, resulting in high levels of turbulence and associated energy loss. The following characteristics describe rapidly varied flow: The curvature of the streamlines is so pronounced that the pressure distribution cannot be assumed to be hydrostatic. Unlike gradually varied flow, changes in flow variables take place within a relatively short distance (Fig. 9-1). The boundary friction is small compared to the other forces, and often negligible. The flow characteristics are fixed by the usually rigid boundary geometry. The velocity distribution coefficients α and β are much greater than unity (1) and cannot be determined accurately. Separation zones, eddies, and rollers tend to complicate the flow pattern, with flow often confined to separation zones. To date, there is no theoretical solution for rapidly varied flow. In lieu of theory, empirical relations are used in many applications. Fig. 9-1  A canal drop, a typical example of rapidly varied flow. The sharp-crested weir The sharp-crested weir is a measuring device in open-channel flow (Chapter 4). It is also the simplest form of overflow spillway. The profile of the spillway can be made to match the shape of the lower surface of the flow nappe. The shape of the flow nappe may be interpreted by the principle of the projectile (Chow, 1959) (Fig. 9-2). According to this principle, the horizontal velocity component of the flow is constant, and the only force acting on the nappe is the gravitational force. In time t, a particle of water in the lower surface of the nappe will travel a horizontal distance x (from the face of the weir) equal to: Fig. 9-2  Nappe profiles over sharp-crested weir by the principle of the projectile (Chow, 1959). x = vo t cos θ (9-1) In the same time, the particle will travel a vertical distance y equal to: y = - vo t sin θ  +  (1/2) g t 2  +  C' (9-2) in which g = gravitational acceleration, and C'  is the value of y at x = 0. The constant C' may be taken as the vertical distance between the highest point of the nappe and the elevation of the crest. Eliminating t  from Eqs. 9-1 and 9-2:   y                x                  x      ____  =  A (____)2  +  B (____)  +  C   H              H                  H          (9-3) in which:                   g H                                 A  =  ________________            2 vo2 cos2 θ                        (9-4)                                                   B  =  - tan θ                                    (9-5)             C'                                 C  =  ______             H   (9-6) Assuming the vertical thickness of the nappe T, an additional term may be added to Eq. 9-5 to yield the nappe equation:   y                x                  x      ____  =  A (____)2  +  B (____)  +  C  +  D   H              H                  H          (9-7) in which D = T / H . Discharge of the sharp-crested weir A common formula for the discharge over a sharp-crested weir is: Q = C L H 3/2 (9-8) in which C = discharge coefficient, L = effective length of the weir crest, and H = measured head above the crest, excluding the velocity head. Discharge coefficients for various types of sharp-crested weirs are given in Chapter 4. 9.2  CREST SHAPE OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY [Rating of Spillways]   [The hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   [Problems]   [References]   •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   The spillway shape shown in Fig. 9-3 is referred to as an ogee shape, because it resembles an ogee curve, shaped somewhat like an S, consisting of two archs that curve in opposite sides, so that the ends are approximately parallel. In practice, notwithstanding the weir shape, negative pressures may develop in an ogee spillway. Excessive negative pressures may lead to cavitation damage and are, therefore, to be controlled. Fig. 9-3 (a)  Emergency spillway of Turner reservoir, in San Diego, California, not spilling. Fig. 9-3 (b)  Emergency spillway of Turner reservoir, in San Diego, California, spilling on February 24, 2005. WES spillway shapes The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has developed several standard shapes at its Waterways Experiment Station, in Vicksburg, Mississippi. These shapes, shown in Fig. 9-4, are referred to as the WES standard spillway shapes. [Click -here- to display] Fig. 9-4  The WES standard spillway shapes (Chow, 1959). The WES shapes follow the equation: X n  =  K Hd n-1 Y (9-9) in which X and Y are the coordinates of the crest profile, with the origin of coordinates at the highest point of the crest; Hd = design head excluding the velocity head of the approach flow; and K and n are parameters which depend on the slope of the upstream face. The values of K and n are shown in Table 9-1. For intermediate values, interpolation is possible. Table 9-1  Values of K and n (Eq. 9-9). Slope on upstream face K n Vertical 2.000 1.850 3 V : 1 H 1.936 1.836 3 V : 2 H 1.939 1.810 3 V : 3 H 1.873 1.776 The upstream face of the spillway may sometimes be designed to set back, as shown by the dashed lines of Fig. 9.4. The set back will not affect the shape of the crest, provided the modification begins with at least one-half of the total head He below the origin. Below this depth, the vertical velocities are small, and the corresponding effect on the nappe profile is negligible. For WES shapes, the discharge over the spillway is: Q  =  C L He 3/2 (9-10) in which He = total energy head on the crest, including the velocity head in the approach channel. Model test have shown that the effect of the approach velocity is negligible when the height h of the spillway is greater than 1.33 Hd, where Hd = design head, excluding the approach velocity. Under this condition, the coefficient of discharge, in U.S. Customary units, is Cd = 4.03. For low spillways, where h/Hd < 1.33, the approach velocity will have appreciable effect on the discharge and, therefore, on the nappe profile. Figure 9-5 shows the effect of the approach velocity on the relationship between (He /Hd) and (C /Cd) for WES spillways with a vertical upstream face. From Fig. 9-5, for h /Hd ≥ 1.33 and He > Hd, the ratio C/Cd > 1. It is seen that the ratio C /Cd varies from 0.70 near crest level (He /Hd ≅ 0) to 1.05 for He /Hd > 1.3. Thus, effectively, C varies from 2.82 to 4.23 (U.S. Customary units). For a sloping upstream face, C is multiplied by the correction factor shown in the top-left side of Fig. 9-5. Fig. 9-5  Head-discharge relation for WES standard spillway shapes (Chow, 1959). WES spillway:  Design example Determine the crest elevation and the shape of an overflow spillway section (WES standard spillway shape) having a vertical upstream face and a crest length L = 250 ft. The design discharge is Q = 75,000 cfs. The upstream water surface, at the design discharge, is at elevation 1,000 ft, while the channel floor is at elevation 880 ft (Fig. 9-6). Fig. 9-6  Design of an overflow spillway section (Chow, 1959). Solution Assume a high overflow spillway, for which the effect of the approach velocity is negligible. Then: Hd = He , and C = 4.03. h + Hd = 1000 - 880 = 120 ft. From Eq. 9-10: Q = C L He3/2 75,000 = (4.03) (250) He3/2 Therefore, the total energy head, including the velocity head, is:  He = 17.7 ft. The approach velocity is: Va = Q / [L (h + Hd ) ] = 75,000 / [(250) (120)] = 2.5 fps. The velocity head is: Ha = Va 2 / (2 g ) = 2.52 / (2 × 32.17) = 0.097 ≅ 0.1 The design head, excluding the velocity head, is: Hd = He - Ha = 17.7 - 0.1 = 17.6 ft. The height of the dam is: h = 120 - 17.6 = 102.4 ft. h = 102.4  >  1.33 Hd  =  23.4 Therefore, the effect of the approach velocity is negligible. The crest elevation is: 1000 - 17.6 = 982.4 ft. From Eq. 9-9 and Table 9-1: X 1.85 = 2 Hd 0.85 Y Therefore, the nappe equation is: Y  =  X 1.85 / (22.89) To calculate the coordinates of the point of tangency (Fig. 9-6): Y'  =  (1.85 / 22.89) X 0.85  =  0.081 X 0.85 Y'  =  = ΔY /ΔX = 1 / 0.6 = 1.667 1.667  =  0.081 X 0.85 Solving for the abscissa of the point of tangency: X = 35.09 ft.  ANSWER. Solving for the ordinate of the point of tangency (Fig. 9-6): Y = X 1.85 / (22.89) = 31.54 ft.  ANSWER. The length of the base, projected from the point of tangency at a slope 1 V : 0.6 H to the base of the dam (see Figs. 9-4 and 9-6) is: Lb  =  0.282 Hd  +  X  +  (0.6) (h - Y ) Lb  =  [ 0.282 (17.6) ]  +  35.09  +  [ (0.6) (102.4 - 31.54) ] Lb  =  82.6 ft.  ANSWER. 0.282 Hd = 4.96 ft.  ANSWER. 0.175 Hd = 3.08 ft.  ANSWER. 0.2 Hd = 3.52 ft.  ANSWER. 0.5 Hd = 8.80 ft.  ANSWER. Example 9-1. Solve the WES spillway design example using the calculator ONLINE WES SPILLWAY.   ONLINE CALCULATION. Use ONLINE WES SPILLWAY, the results are the same as the hand calculation. For example, point 10 (the point of tangency) has X(10) = 35.182 ft (compare to 35.09 ft), and Y(10) = -31.696 ft (compare to -31.54 ft). Ogee-type spillways Figure 9-7 shows several ogee-type spillways. This type of spillway is preferred for high dams, because their discharge coefficient (C = 4.03 in U.S. Customary units and C = 2.22 in SI units) is substantially higher than the theoretical value for broad-crested weirs (C = 3.087 in U.S. Customary units and C = 1.704 in SI units) (Chapter 4 Critical Flow Control). Fig. 9-7 (a)  Emergency spillway at El Capitan Dam, on the San Diego river, San Diego, California. Fig. 9-7 (b)  Emergency spillway at Mangla Dam, on the Jhelum river, Pakistan. Fig. 9-7 (c)  Emergency spillway at Oroville Dam, on the Feather river, near Oroville, California. Click -here- to view a video on the Arizona spillway of Hoover Dam. Broad-crested spillways Figure 9-8 shows two broad-crested spillways. The 8000-ft long relief weir (emergency spillway) of the Boerasirie Conservancy, shown in Fig. 9-8 (a), has been designed with discharge coefficient varying from C = 1.45 at spill level to C = 1.78 at the design head Hd = 0.215 m (discharge coefficient in SI units). The Valle Grande dam, shown in Fig. 9-8 (b), is an off-stream storage reservoir, with a small contributing drainage area; thus, no major floods are expected and the broad-crested weir is considered sufficient to handle the design peak flow. Fig. 9-8 (a)  The 8000-ft long relief weir, Boerasirie Conservancy, Guyana. Fig. 9-8 (b)  Overflow spillway at Villa Grande Dam, Cuajone, Peru. Labyrinth spillways The labyrinth spillway is used to increase the effective length of the weir crest, when warranted due to an increased risk of hydrologic failure. Figure 9-9 shows three examples of labyrinth spillways. The labyrinth works well at the design stage above spillway crest. However, for stages that are higher than the design stage, the effective length eventually reduces to the actual length and the labyrinth ceases to provide the desired advantage. Fig. 9-9 (a)  Valentine Mill pond, Valentine, Nebraska. Fig. 9-9 (b)  Lower Las Vegas Wash detention basin, Las Vegas, Nevada. Fig. 9-9 (c)  Ute Dam, New Mexico. Fuse spillways A fuse spillway or fuse plug is an embankment designed to wash out in a predictable and controlled manner when a capacity in excess of the normal capacity of the service spillway and outlet works is required (Pugh and Gray, 1984). According to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, fuse plug designs have been selected for the Bartlett and Horseshoe dams, on the Verde River, Arizona. The fuse plug for Bartlett Dam is designed with an erosion resistant invert and abutment structure to pass 10,100 m3/s. Three erodible embankment sections will operate in sequence. The Horseshoe Dam fuse plug is designed to pass 6,850 m3/s through three 44- to 52-m-long openings 6.0-m to 7.9-m high. Fig. 9-10  Fuse spillway, La Leche river, Lambayeque, Peru. Other spillways features Other spillway features include rubber-gated spillways (Fig. 9-11), sky-jump spillways (Fig. 9-12), and baffle-dissipation structures (Fig. 9-13). Fig. 9-11  Rubber-gated emergency spillway, Arroyo Pasajero retention basin, near Coalinga, California. Fig. 9-12  Sky-jump spillway, Oros dam, Jaguaribe river, Ceara, Brazil. Fig. 9-13  Baffle-dissipation structure, Gallito Ciego dam, La Libertad, Peru. Lake Oroville Spillway Incident In February 2017, both flood control and emergency spillways at Lake Oroville, in northern California, failed after 12.8 in of rain fell between February 6 and 10 on the Feather river basin. The timeline of the events that led to the failure is documented in the video Lake Oroville Spillway Incident Timeline. By September 2018, the cost of repairs and other issues stemming from the failure had climbed to $1.1 billion. Fig. 9-14  Aftermath of the failure of the flood control spillway at Lake Oroville. 9.3  RATING OF SPILLWAYS [The hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   [Problems]   [References]   •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   At the design discharge, the pressure on the spillway crest is close to atmospheric. The design head HD, which includes the velocity head, corresponds to the design discharge. Flow rates less than the design flow rate will produce pressures on the spillway face above the atmospheric pressure, while flow rates greater than the design flow rate will produce subatmospheric pressures. The discharge over an ungated ogee spillway may be given as follows (Roberson et al., 1998): QD  =  CD (2 g)1/2 L HD 3/2 (9-11) in which QD = design discharge, CD = dimensionless design discharge coefficient, L = crest length perpendicular to the flow, and HD = total design head on the crest, including the approach velocity head ha. Figure 9-15 shows values of CD as a function of P/HD, in which P = height of the spillway crest measured from the channel bed. Note that for large values of P/HD, the value of CD approaches asymptotically a value of CD = 0.492. In general, the discharge over an ogee-type spillways is: Q  =  C (2 g)1/2 L H 3/2 (9-12) in which Q = discharge, C = dimensionless discharge coefficient, L = crest length perpendicular to the flow, and H = head on the crest, including the approach velocity head. Fig. 9-15  Variation of discharge coefficient CD with relative dam height P/HD (Roberson et al., 1998). The ratio C/CD varies as a function of H/HD as shown in Fig. 9-16. Figures 9-15 and 9-16 may be used to develop a spillway rating curve, i.e., a relation between flow rate Q and head above spillway crest H. If the actual head H exceeds the design head HD, subatmospheric pressures will develop on the spillway, and this may lead to cavitation damage. To prevent cavitation damage, the negative pressure head should be kept within -20 ft. Fig. 9-16  Variation of dimensionless discharge coefficient C/CD with relative stage above crest level H /HD (Roberson et al., 1998). Spillway rating:  Example Determine the rating curve for an ogee-type spillway with length L = 30 m. The design head is:  HD = 10 m. The freeboard is:  Fb = 5 m. The spillway crest elevation is at Elev. 1,000 m. The riverbed elevation is at Elev. 970 m. Neglect the approach velocity. Solution L = 30 m. P = 1000 - 970 = 30 m. P /HD = 30 / 10 = 3 From Fig. 9-15, for P /HD = 3:  CD = 0.493 The spillway rating equation is (Eq. 9-12): Q  =  C (2 g )1/2 L H 3/2 Q  =  C (2 × 9.806)1/2 (30) H 3/2 Q  =  132.856 C H 3/2 The spillway rating equation is: Q  =  132.856 C H 3/2  ANSWER. The calculations are summarized in Table 9-2. Column 1 shows postulated water-surface elevations, from crest elevation (1,000 m) through design water-surface elevation (1,010 m) to a water-surface elevation that includes the freeboard (1,015 m). Column 2 shows the actual head over the spillway crest. Column 3 shows the H /HD ratios. Column 4 shows C /CD ratios, obtained from Fig. 9-16. Column 5 shows values of C = CD (C /CD) = 0.493 (C /CD) Column 6 shows the values of Q calculated with the spillway rating equation: Q  =  132.856 C H 3/2 The spillway rating curve is shown in Fig. 9-17. Table 9-2  Calculation of spillway rating. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Elevation (m) H (m) H /HD C /CD C Q (m3/s) 1000 0 0.0 0.780 0.385 0.000 1001 1 0.1 0.811 0.400 53.119 1002 2 0.2 0.842 0.415 155.986 1003 3 0.3 0.869 0.428 295.584 1004 4 0.4 0.895 0.441 468.987 1005 5 0.5 0.915 0.451 670.047 1006 6 0.6 0.935 0.461 900.052 1007 7 0.7 0.951 0.469 1153.604 1008 8 0.8 0.967 0.477 1433.146 1009 9 0.9 0.984 0.485 1739.271 1010 10 1.0 1.000 0.493 2071.234 1011 11 1.1 1.013 0.499 2419.431 1012 12 1.2 1.025 0.505 2790.775 1013 13 1.3 1.037 0.511 3182.097 1014 14 1.4 1.048 0.517 3595.692 1015 15 1.5 1.059 0.522 4029.600 Fig. 9-17  Calculated spillway rating curve. Example 9-2 Solve the spillway rating example using an online calculator.   ONLINE CALCULATION. Use ONLINE OGEE RATING, with L = 30 m, HD = 10 m, approach velocity Va = 0, dam height P = 30 m, freeboard Fb = 5 m, and spillway crest elevation E = 1000 m. The result of ONLINE OGEE RATING is the same of Table 9-2. 9.4  THE HYDRAULIC JUMP [Questions]   [Problems]   [References]   •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Rating of Spillways]   The hydraulic jump is an open-channel flow phenomenon where the flow changes suddenly from supercritical to subcritical (Fig. 9-18). The equation for the hydraulic jump is developed for a horizontal channel, for which the jump becomes stationary, i.e., it occurs in a specific place in the channel. A nonstationary hydraulic jump may occur in a channel of finite (nonzero) slope. In practice, the stationary hydraulic jump is preferred over the nonstationary or "moving" jump. Fig. 9-18  A hydraulic jump downstream of a sluice gate. The hydraulic jump is used in the following applications: To dissipate energy in water flowing over dams, weirs, and other hydraulic structures, to prevent downstream scouring of the structures. To recover hydraulic head on the downstream side of a measuring flume. To increase weight on an apron and reduce uplift pressures under a masonry structure. To aerate water for purposes of water purification. Hydraulic jump equation A hydraulic jump will form in a rectangular channel if the following equation is satisfied (See Example 3-1):   y2         1                                ____  =  ____  [ (1  +  8 F1 2 )1/2  -  1 ]   y1         2                                      (9-13) where y1 = upstream flow depth (supercritical), y2 = downstream flow depth (subcritical), and F1 = Froude number of the upstream flow. The depth y1 is the initial depth and y2 is the sequent depth. The hydraulic jump relation (Eq. 9-13) is shown in Fig. 9-19. Note that for Froude number F1 > 2 the equation is almost linear. Fig. 9-19  The hydraulic jump relation. Example 9-3 Given y1 = 0.1 m and v1 = 5 m/s, calculate the sequent depth y2. Confirm the result using ONLINE CHANNEL 11. The upstream flow Froude number is:  F1 = 5.049. Using Eq. 9-13:  y2 = 0.665 m.   ONLINE CALCULATION. Using ONLINE CHANNEL 11, with y1 = 0.1 m, and v1 = 5 m/s, the Froude number is: F1 = 5.049. The sequent depth is y2 = 0.665 m, confirming the hand calculation. Types of hydraulic jump Hydraulic jumps are classified as shown in Table 9-3 (Chow, 1959). Table 9-3  Types of hydraulic jump. Upstream Froude number F1 Type of jump Graphical description 1.0 - 1.7 Undular jump 1.7 - 2.5 Weak jump 2.5 - 4.5 Oscillating jump 4.5 - 9.0 Steady jump > 9.0 Strong jump Characteristics of the hydraulic jump The energy loss is:                                   (y2  -  y1)3                                 ΔE  =  E1  -  E2  =  ______________                                      4 y1 y2   (9-14) [See also Lab video:  The hydraulic jump]. The relative energy loss is:   ΔE                   E2                                 ______  =  1  -  ______    E1                   E1   (9-15) The efficiency of the jump is (see box below):    E2           ( 1  +  8 F12 )3/2  -  4 F12  +  1                              ______  =  _______________________________    E1                     8 F12 ( 2  +  F12 ) (9-16) The height of the jump is:                                                                hj  =  y2  -  y1                                       (9-17) The relative height of the jump is:   hj            y2          y1                    _____  =  _____  -  _____  E1           E1          E1   (9-18) where y1 /E1 = relative initial depth, and y2 /E1 = relative sequent depth. In terms of the Froude number of the upstream flow, the relative height of the jump is:    hj             ( 1  +  8 F12 )1/2  -  3                               ______  =  _______________________    E1                     2  +  F12 (9-19) Figure 9-20 is a graphical portrayal of the characteristics of the hydraulic jump. Note the following: The relative sequent depth reaches a maximum value y2 /E1 = 0.8 for F1 = 1.73. The relative height of the jump reaches a maximum value hj /E1 = 0.507 for F1 = 2.77. It is confirmed that for F1 = 1, the initial depth y1 is equal to 2/3 (0.667) of the specific energy E1. For F > 3, the changes in all characteristics become gradual. Fig. 9-20  Characteristics of the hydraulic jump. Efficiency of the hydraulic jump With reference to Fig. 9-21, the efficiency of the hydraulic jump is:    E2           ( 1  +  8 F12 )3/2  -  4 F12  +  1                              ______  =  _______________________________    E1                     8 F12 ( 2  +  F12 ) (9-16) Fig. 9-21  Definition sketch for a hydraulic jump. F1 = v1 / (gy1)1/2 F2 = v2 / (gy2)1/2 v1y1 = v2 y2 v12y12 = v22 y22 F12 y13 = F22 y23 F22 = F12 / (y2 / y1)3 The hydraulic jump equation is (Eq. 9-13): y2 / y1 = (1/2) [ (1 + 8 F12)1/2 - 1 ] N 2 = 1 + 8 F12 y2 / y1 = (1/2) [ N - 1] 2 (y2 / y1) = N - 1 (y2 / y1)3 = (1/8) [ N - 1]3 2 (y2 / y1)3 = (1/4) [ N - 1]3 N = ( 1 + 8 F12)1/2 N 3 = ( 1 + 8 F12)3/2 N 2 - 1 = 8 F12 F12 = ( N 2 - 1) / 8 4 F12 = ( N 2 - 1) / 2 The efficiency of the hydraulic jump is: E2/E1 = [ y2 + v22/(2g) ] / [ y1 + v12/(2g) ] E2/E1 = [ y2(1 + F22/2) ] / [ y1(1 + F12/2) ] E2/E1 = 2 (y2/y1) {1 + F12 / [ 2 (y2/y1)3] } / (2 + F12) E2/E1 = (N - 1) {1 + (N 2 - 1) / [ 2 (N - 1)3 ] } / (2 + F12) E2/E1 = (N 2 - 1)(N - 1) {1 + (N 2 - 1) / [ 2 (N - 1)3 ] } / [8 F12(2 + F12) ] E2/E1 = [ (N 2 - 1)(N - 1) + (1/2)(N + 1)2 ] / [ 8 F12(2 + F12) ] E2/E1 = { (N 3 - N 2 - N - 1) + [ (N 2/2) + N + (1/2)] } / [ 8 F12(2 + F12) ] E2/E1 = { (N 3 - [(N 2 - 1)/2] + 1} / [ 8 F12 (2 + F12) ] E2/E1 = [ (1 + 8 F12)3/2 - 4F12 + 1] / [ 8 F12(2 + F12) ]   ANSWER. Example 9-4 Given q = 0.5 m2/s and ΔE = 0.678 m, calculate the sequent depths y1 and y2. Confirm the result using ONLINE CHANNEL 16. The calculation proceeds by trial and error. Assume a low value of F1, say 2. Use Eq. 9-13 to calculate y2 / y1. Use Eq. 9-14 to solve for y1. Solve for the usptream velocity:  v1 = q / y1 Calculate the value of F1. If the value calculated in Step 5 is the same as that assumed in Step 1 (within a certain tolerance), stop and report the sequent depths. Otherwise, increase the value of F1 by a suitable increment, and return to Step 1.   ONLINE CALCULATION. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 16, with q = 0.5 m2/s and ΔE = 0.678 m. The sequent depths are:  y1 = 0.1 m and y2 = 0.665 m. Example 9-5 Given y1 = 0.1 m and v1 = 5 m/s, calculate the efficiency of the hydraulic jump. Confirm the result using ONLINE CHANNEL 18. The upstream flow Froude number is:  F1 = 5.049. Using Eq. 9-16:  E2 / E1 = 0.505.   ONLINE CALCULATION. Using ONLINE CHANNEL 18, with y1 = 0.1 m, and v1 = 5 m/s, the Froude number is: F1 = 5.049. The efficiency of the jump is: E2 / E1 = 0.505, confirming the hand calculation. Length of the hydraulic jump The length of the hydraulic jump is defined as the distance measured from the front face to a point (on the water surface) located immediately downstream of the roller (see insert of Fig. 9-21). The relative length of the jump L/y2 has been determined experimentally. It varies from about 5.0 to 6.15 for a wide range of upstream Froude numbers. Within the range 4.5 ≤ F1 ≤ 13, the relative length of the jump is slightly greater than 6 (Fig. 9-22). Fig. 9-22  Length of the hydraulic jump (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation). Profile of the hydraulic jump Experimental measurements have shown that the actual surface profile of the hydraulic jump varies somewhat with the upstream Froude number. The profiles may be plotted as dimensionless curves, as shown in Fig. 9-23. A closeup of a hydraulic jump is shown in Fig. 9-24. Fig. 9-23  Dimensionless profiles of the hydraulic jump (Chow, 1959). Fig. 9-24  Closeup of a hydraulic jump. QUESTIONS [Problems]   [References]   •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Rating of Spillways]   [The Hydraulic Jump]   How does rapidly varied flow differ from gradually varied flow? Is there a theoretical solution of one-dimensional rapidly varied flow? What is the exponent of the rating in a broad-crested weir? What is the coefficient of the rating for high spillways in U.S. Customary units? What does "ogee" stand for? What is the rationale for the use of a labyrinth spillway? What is the risk when flow over a spillway exceeds the design stage? What flow condition produces a hydraulic jump? Is the hydraulic jump equation linear or nonlinear? How is the length of the hydraulic jump measured? PROBLEMS [References]   •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Rating of Spillways]   [The Hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   An emergency spillway is being considered for the Demerera Water Conservancy to safeguard the integrity of the dam under conditions of climate change (similar to Fig. 9-25). Assume that the existing relief sluices would be inoperable during a major flood due to high tailwater. Determine the length of the free-overflow spillway required to pass the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). The following data is applicable: PMF 1-day duration:   428 mm Hydrologic abstraction:   18 mm Contributing drainage area:   582 km2 Time base of the flood hydrograph:   3 days Embankment crest elevation:   18.288 m Spillway crest elevation:   17.526 m Freeboard:   0.3 m Weir discharge coefficient:   1.45 For simplicity, assume a triangular-shaped flood hydrograph. Use all the freeboard to contain the PMF. Fig. 9-25  The 8000-ft weir of the Boerasirie Water Conservancy. Design an overflow-spillway section having a vertical upstream face and a crest length L = 150 ft. The design discharge is Q = 50,000 ft3/s. The upstream water surface at design discharge is at Elev. 750 ft, and the average channel floor is at Elev. 650 ft (see Fig. 9-6 for graphical example). Use ONLINE OGEE RATING to determine the rating for an ogee spillway with length L = 15 m, design head Hd = 2 m, spillway crest elevation = 1045 m, river bed elevation = 1000 m, and freeboard Fb = 1 m. Neglect the approach velocity. What should be the spillway length to pass the Probable Maximum Flood QPMF = 250 m3/s while taking all the freeboard? Express spillway length to nearest 0.1 m by excess. Prove Eq. 9-14. Prove Eq. 9-19. Calculate the energy loss in a hydraulic jump, given the sequent depths y1 = 0.58 m and y2 = 2.688 m. Calculate the relative height of the hydraulic jump hj /E1 for F1 = 3. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 11 to calculate the sequent depth y2 through a hydraulic jump when the discharge is q = 5 m2/s and the initial depth y1 = 0.58 m. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 12 to determine the sequent depth y2 and energy loss ΔE through a hydraulic jump when the discharge is q = 10 ft2/s and the upstream flow depth is y1 = 0.5 ft. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 16 to calculate the sequent depths through a hydraulic jump when the discharge is q = 10 ft2/s and the energy loss is ΔE = 3.287 ft. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 16 to calculate the sequent depths through a hydraulic jump when the discharge is q = 5 m2/s and the energy loss is ΔE = 1.5 m. Use ONLINE CHANNEL 18 to calculate the efficiency of the hydraulic jump E2/E1 for q = 10 ft2/s and y1 = 0.5 ft. REFERENCES •   [Top]   [The Sharp-Crested Weir]   [Crest Shape of Overflow Spillway]   [Rating of Spillways]   [The Hydraulic Jump]   [Questions]   [Problems]   Chow, V. T. 1959. Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw Hill, New York. Roberson, J. A., J. J. Cassidy, and M. H. Chaudhry. 1998. Hydraulic Engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York, Second edition. Pugh, C. A., and E. W. Gray. 1984. Fuse Plug Embankments in Auxiliary Spillways - Developing Design Guidelines and Parameters, United States Committee on Large Dams (as cited in U.S. Bureau of Reclamation). http://openchannelhydraulics.sdsu.edu 210913 17:00